Ultimately, I believe true 'liberation' and 'freedom' for the oppressed in the middle east (those that are denied opportunity and freedom....particularly youth, women and children) will have to be achieved by the people in the middle east for themselves.
Perhaps I am biased, being Indian (given our history of achieving freedom from the British through struggle). This freedom will be achieved on the ground over time with education, knowledge and a taste for how it feels to be able to determine one's own future. Check out this great article from last week's Wall Street Journal. To me, the media is the most important tool in helping bring information to people....so their own minds and hearts are changed. We should be spending billions on this....not mere millions. Look what TV, knowledge/information and opportunity have done for post-liberation India!!
Lastly, to clarify, I am talking about true internal change....not just a change in the broad, high level framework of government (which the US has facilitated in places like Iraq). The high level framework too is important...but not nearly enough in an of itself.Liberty TV
By KENNETH Y. TOMLINSON
May 6, 2006; Page A8
In recent weeks, we've heard a great deal in Washington about how we ought to be broadcasting to Iran. But it might be instructive to examine what U.S. international broadcasting is already doing.
Very recently, on a Persian-language satellite television broadcast from the United States, the people of Iran learned that Iran's oldest and largest student organization, Tahkim Vahdat, urged the government to suspend uranium enrichment and to cooperate with the international community by restricting nuclear development to peaceful uses. The group called the government's behavior "irrational and confrontational." Needless to say none of this appeared in Iran's government-controlled media; few rulers on earth exercise the degree of censorship enforced by the Iranian government.
Another program featured the story of Hossein Derakhshan, once jailed in Iran for starting an Internet blog. Upon his release, he managed to get to Canada where he now runs the most popular blog -- in Iran.
Or consider this exchange that occurred on our nightly Persian-language news and current affairs program on the Voice of America.
Moderator, Ms. Setareh Derakshesh: "Our guests today are Mr. Bijan Kian, a businessman associated with the American Council on Foreign Relations, and Dr. Abbas Maleki of Sharif University in Tehran, who is currently a Harvard Research Fellow in the United States. Dr. Maleki, how do you see the possibility of direct negotiations between Washington and Tehran on Iran's nuclear policies?"
Dr. Maleki: "From the beginning, direct talks have been part of Iran's agenda. From Iran's point of view, the nuclear issue is not a real problem. This is part of the overall process of development which is going on in all parts of our society, like nanotechnology, biotechnology, IT and so on . . ."
Mr. Kian: "It is amazing to hear about such claims as progress in nanotechnology in a country where there is widespread unemployment, poverty, drug addiction, prostitution, so many women's issues and, finally, political repression and coercion. The real dispute is not between our two countries. It is between the Iranian people and the government of the Islamic Republic . . ."
Dr. Maleki: "Well! Using polemic language and slogans talking about political coercion is very easy. Even in the U.S., that technologically speaking is the most advanced country in the world, you still have poverty everywhere, unemployment and so on. Tehran is so much cleaner than New York. You can go and check the trash-ridden streets of New York. Go and have a look at poor people there. . . . Just look at the war in Iraq and Afghanistan and now this atmosphere of war the U.S. government is creating about Iran . . ."
Ms. Derakshesh: "Dr. Maleki: The majority of the people in Iran live under the poverty line -- and Iran's prisons are filled with political prisoners . . ."
Dr. Maleki: "Excuse me! You are the moderator yet you are passing a wild judgment."
Ms. Derakshesh: "This is not my personal opinion, sir . . ."
Dr. Maleki: "Whose facts are these, where did you get them -- that there are political prisoners in Iran?"
Ms. Derakshesh: "These are facts reported by credible international human rights organizations."
Mr. Kian: "Whenever we talk about what is really going on in Iran, what we say will be branded as slogans by supporters by the regime. I have to emphasize that the American government is not in favor of war with Iran. Just look at what has been said by President Bush and his secretary of state."
* * *
In VOA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the U.S. has a model illustrating how broadcasting news and information (i.e., the truth) can lead to the liberation of a people.
That certainly occurred in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Recognizing that fact, the U.S. Broadcasting Board of Governors moved to increase television and radio to Iran long before the current crisis in that country. In early 2003 we launched Farda, a round-the-clock, youth-oriented radio service to Iran. A few months later we began broadcasting daily Persian news and current affairs satellite television.
The television launch may have been modest -- $1.9 million for 30 minutes daily with repeats. But we have come to recognize that satellite television is to the future what shortwave radio was to the past.
That daily program today is an hour (with repeats), and by September, thanks to better than $9 million from the Bush administration and Congress, we will be broadcasting four original television hours -- with news, debates and call-in shows -- daily. Funds in a supplemental now before Congress could increase these broadcasts even more -- and strengthen our coverage.
Small satellite dishes are proliferating in Iran and there are strong indications that VOA's nightly programming is becoming a staple for large numbers of Iranians. Telephone polling (which tends to undercount audiences living under repressive regimes) show that better than one-in-five adult television viewers say they regularly watch VOA's satellite television programs.
As was the case with RFE/RL and VOA in the Cold War, it is important that our broadcasts are provocative -- and credible. Intense journalistic supervision is critical to achieving this goal. Truth does not lie half way between the views of Washington and Tehran. But talk and debate programs give Iranians a taste of freedom -- and enlightenment.
Ultimately, the future of Iran rests with the people of Iran. Just as in the Cold War when the people ultimately prevailed over their oppressors, it will be the people of Iran who will deliver their country from the tyrants who rule them now. To paraphrase Winston Churchill, we can give them the tools -- information the mullahs don't want them to hear and debate challenging the lies of mullah-sympathizers -- and the people of Iran can finish the job.
Mr. Tomlinson is chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which oversees U.S. international broadcasting.